Why don't Bitcoin Core organization:
- ban Gloria Zhao (nick: glozow) who introduced the destructive change "uncap OP_RETURN" PR#32406 in Core v30,
- fix the code?
Yes, and fix the code22.2%
No, keep unchanged77.8%
9 votes \ 65 days left
pull down to refresh
related posts
321 sats \ 2 replies \ @kruw 19h
Bitcoin is censorship resistant. If you don't like that, then fork off.
reply
50 sats \ 1 reply \ @gregtonoski OP 19h
The question is about Bitcoin Core organization and one of their members. It is not about Bitcoin protocol.
reply
224 sats \ 0 replies \ @denlillaapan 18h
then stop being a bitch about it...? move on, nothing much to see here really
reply
204 sats \ 5 replies \ @south_korea_ln 19h
This is a weird obsession some people have with Gloria.
She did not act unilaterally.
reply
0 sats \ 4 replies \ @gregtonoski OP 18h
Disagree. She merged the destructive change on her own. She is one of the five people with such permission.
reply
21 sats \ 3 replies \ @south_korea_ln 18h
Why not fork off then if you disagree? It's open source.
It's all good then. Core trusts her to make the decision that reflects the ACKS and NACKS of contributors to the code.
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @gregtonoski OP 17h
There were overwhelmingly more NACKs than ACKs so she shouldn't have accepted (merged) the change following your logic. Do I understand you correctly?
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @south_korea_ln 13h
Be better.
You're reading selectively.
You know what i mean. You've decided to pretend you don't.
I'm leaving this interaction.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @gregtonoski OP 12h
There had been another proposal of the same change to Core and it had been rejected two years earlier.
I deny the allegation that I pretended.
reply