pull down to refresh
210 sats \ 2 replies \ @Scoresby OP 5h \ on: BIP 444: Reduced Data Temporary Softfork bitcoin
If this is such an emergency, why weren't they concerned about such transactions being mined before? It was possible, and yet no one was running around screaming about it.
Unless I'm mistaken, a user could have configured datacarriersize to be 100kb in many prior versions of Core. Also there was Libre relay, which I think would have relayed such transactions. Why wasn't this an emergency last year or the year before?
I don't like being pressured into doing things because people falsely claim it's an emergency.
Or maybe I’m not, because it’s straight out of the playbook of how to manipulate people
reply
Very much seems like it.
What's also quite telling is how fresh many of the GitHub accounts are from most people interacting on that PR.
reply