pull down to refresh

54 sats \ 4 replies \ @optimism 21h \ on: AI-powered search engines rely on “less popular” sources, researchers find AI
I'm not sure if "top 100" is a qualifier though. If we search google for the literal title of the top ~AI post (#1062431) on SN this year, it's not in the top 100 results either (when logged out)
write
preview
100 sats \ 3 replies \ @0xbitcoiner OP 21h
No? 👀 https://www.google.com/search?q=%22What%E2%80%99s+your+favorite+vibe+coding+setup%3F%22
reply
44 sats \ 2 replies \ @optimism 21h
With quotes, sure. But then you're already searching for something you know exists, not asking?
Maybe my use of the word literal is incorrect here.
reply
100 sats \ 1 reply \ @0xbitcoiner OP 21h
Haha. It was an joke attempt! I get what you're saying, not sure if the top 100 is the best comparison either. We gotta keep in mind that search algorithms are different and Google has its own bias too. I just see that study as a way to compare things, nothing more.
reply
55 sats \ 0 replies \ @optimism 20h
Of course! lol
I just see that study as a way to compare things, nothing more.
I see it as: wow, AI broke Google's listing extortion scheme. lol
reply