Regulators in Nevada issued a cease-and-desist order dated Oct. 22 against the custodian, saying that Fortress’ liquidity position is “wholly inadequate to meet customer obligations.”The state’s Financial Institutions Division found that Fortress owed millions to clients, according to the order. The firm admitted it couldn’t meet customer withdrawals and failed to produce basic financial documentation, including account reconciliations and recent monthly statements.“I learned after assuming the position of Chief Executive Officer that the Trust was experiencing severe financial difficulties and challenges related to events that occurred prior to assuming my role,” current CEO Anthony Botticella said in a signed statement included in the filing. “These pre-existing issues materially affected the Trust’s ability to continue as an ongoing viable entity.” Botticella became CEO in December 2023, the declaration said.According to the order, Fortress owes clients more than $8 million in fiat currency and $4 million in crypto at current prices. However, the custodian has less than $200,000 in cash and only around $1 million in crypto on hand, the filing showed.
Fortress was unable to provide financial statements for July, August or September, the Nevada regulator said.In 2023, Ripple backed out of the deal to buy Fortress after Fortune published a story saying that Fortress lost millions in a hack. Then-CEO Scott Purcell told Bloomberg a third-party service was breached, but his company hadn’t been directly hacked.
pull down to refresh
related posts
111 sats \ 4 replies \ @optimism 21h
Wait... Ripple acquired Fortress.
Didn't Ripple make everyone whole?:
How can there be not enough of anything if Ripple made everyone whole? Were they just kidding?
Edit: ohwait, they were kidding. i missed the backing out part.
reply
100 sats \ 3 replies \ @Scoresby OP 21h
I believe the Ripple acquisition fell through:
Also here:
https://blockworks.co/news/ripple-abandons-plan-fortress-trust
And here:
https://coingeek.com/ripple-bails-out-fortress-trust-after-hackers-steal-customer-assets/
It's weird because the acquisition announcement is written in the past tense "has acquired" and it is what comes up first in most searches. It was dated sept 8 2023, but the cancellation came within a week.
reply
185 sats \ 2 replies \ @optimism 20h
Thanks. I just realized that. Funny because I also don't remember hearing before that they backed out; just that they acquired. But then the only reason I saw it in the first place was because everyone was shouting at Mr. Swan on my feed back then.
reply
100 sats \ 1 reply \ @Scoresby OP 20h
Yeah! The canceled deal was strangely not taken up by the usual sources. Even now in search results the acuisition announcement is more likely to come up than the news that it fell through.
reply
102 sats \ 0 replies \ @optimism 19h
AI fixes this. Maybe. Haha
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @BlokchainB 14h
Swan used to use them
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @standardcrypto 21h
hack or exit scam, could we have a poll?
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @SwapMarket 21h
Ah, a hack, what a surprise (not)
reply