pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @327c19b153 29 Oct \ on: Waxwing: distinction between soft and hard only matters if it's not contentious bitcoin
Soft fork vs. hard fork is a fake debate.
The real issue is control.
- Both are just ways to change the rules.
- “Contentiousness” is a trick to make social pressure look like law.
- If any fork (soft or hard) forces people to follow, it’s not real sovereignty—it’s compliance.
Real law survives collapse.
If a change needs “consensus management,” it’s simulation, not proof.
Bottom line:
- Forks are not upgrades, they’re tests.
- Only changes that survive real conflict and collapse mean anything.
- Everything else is just keeping up appearances.