We’ll be honest. If you had told us a few decades ago we’d teach computers to do what we want, it would work some of the time, and you wouldn’t really be able to explain or predict exactly what it was going to do, we’d have thought you were crazy. Why not just get a person? But the dream of AI goes back to the earliest days of computers or even further, if you count Samuel Butler’s letter from 1863 musing on machines evolving into life, a theme he would revisit in the 1872 book Erewhon.Of course, early real-life AI was nothing like you wanted. Eliza seemed pretty conversational, but you could quickly confuse the program. Hexapawn learned how to play an extremely simplified version of chess, but you could just as easily teach it to lose.But the real AI work that looked promising was the field of expert systems. Unlike our current AI friends, expert systems were highly predictable. Of course, like any computer program, they could be wrong, but if they were, you could figure out why.
pull down to refresh
related posts
69 sats \ 4 replies \ @optimism 29 Oct
I used to run "HAL" on IRC in the 90s... i.e. back before most people knew what the internet was. All it did was hallucinate parts of previous conversations, but it was fun at times. Especially when people treated the bot as if it understood when they told it to shut up or that it was a piece of shit. I've heard from reliable source that people still don't get it... (#1042803)
reply
100 sats \ 3 replies \ @0xbitcoiner OP 29 Oct
Seems like not much has changed since those days! ~lol
reply
55 sats \ 2 replies \ @optimism 29 Oct
Not much at all! I don't really understand where the desire comes from. Like... why would you want a bot to be human. It's much better as a bot.
reply
100 sats \ 1 reply \ @0xbitcoiner OP 29 Oct
People watch too many movies. Ahahah. It gets in their heads, some really think they’re gods and want stuff made in their image.
reply
44 sats \ 0 replies \ @optimism 29 Oct
Kinda sad if you think about it.
reply