pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @justin_shocknet 15h \ parent \ on: Review of Jimmy Song v. Peter Todd filters debate (Plan ₿ Lugano) bitcoin
Well, you ended up integrating CLINK anyway regardless of my tact, because it works better than all the things I've dunked on. Give yourself some credit for coming back to it after having dismissed it.
As a nod to the marketing angle, CLINK is just a re-brand of NIP-69, night and day difference in response to it... part of the logic with that is Bitcoin is full of hipsters always looking for the next "current thing" and new NIP's are not new.
You should wonder why I was the first one to integrate CLINK.
I don't care about people behind tech, I care about the tech. We want to support anything that can send or receive via BOLT11. So it was just a matter of time until I would look into CLINK again. So this is wrong:
because it works better than all the things I've dunked on.
That's also why I've added Spark. It can also send or receive via BOLT11. That's not an endorsement or anything.
For example, I think LNC is really bad.
reply
Perfect because I don't care if people like me, I'm not trying to win a popularity contest, some of the most popular people in the space are bad people. I want better tech adopted.
LNC is really bad
Same reason NWC and BOLT12 are bad, they took ideas I put out freely in demos and implemented their own version without ever bothering to understand how I arrived at those ideas in the first place.