pull down to refresh

100 sats \ 5 replies \ @nkmg1c_ventures OP 1 Nov \ parent \ on: Project Alexandria: Freeing Scientific Knowledge from Copyright Burdens via LLMs AI
Can you link/speak more about these deals with publishers? I'd be curious to read about scope of the deals
write
preview
50 sats \ 4 replies \ @optimism 1 Nov
I'll work on getting you a list. The most prominent is probably Elsevier Health -> OpenEvidence from 2 years ago.
reply
100 sats \ 3 replies \ @nkmg1c_ventures OP 1 Nov
Cool, thank you. I should have googled myself before asking. For anyone else that's curious, I came across this:
https://futureweek.com/a-complete-list-of-publishers-striking-ai-content-licensing-deals/
https://digiday.com/media/2024-in-review-a-timeline-of-the-major-deals-between-publishers-and-ai-companies/
https://petebrown.quarto.pub/pnp-ai-partnerships/
reply
10 sats \ 2 replies \ @optimism 1 Nov
Those are mostly MSM publishers though - something that the AI companies chase because it's in their interest to buy the journalists. There is less threat coming from scientific publications (and both Anthropic and Meta have allegedly been training on libgen) so these deals are less visible.
reply
202 sats \ 1 reply \ @nkmg1c_ventures OP 1 Nov
Springer is a big deal, I saw a deal with them. They're privately held too, so less likely to disclose all the terms.
reply
30 sats \ 0 replies \ @optimism 1 Nov
From https://blogs.microsoft.com/blog/2024/10/01/an-ai-companion-for-everyone/ under CoPilot Daily:
We are working with partners such as Reuters, Axel Springer, Hearst Magazines, USA TODAY Network and Financial Times, and plan to add more sources over time.
reply