pull down to refresh
Gemini:
🏛️ Lawsuit: MARA Holdings, Inc. et al. v. Hood County, Texas, et al.🏛️ Lawsuit: MARA Holdings, Inc. et al. v. Hood County, Texas, et al.
This case, filed on October 27, 2025, is the focus of the battle to either block or invalidate the creation of the new municipality of Mitchell Bend.
Here is a summary of the complaint and the current status as of today, November 4, 2025 (Election Day):
📜 The Allegations in the 47-Page Complaint📜 The Allegations in the 47-Page Complaint
MARA's complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas (Case No. 4:25-cv-01202-O), makes several serious allegations against Hood County officials:
- Intentional and Unconstitutional Conduct: MARA claims the county officials acted with the explicit intent to harm MARA's business, which violates the company's constitutional rights.
- Unlawful Targeting: MARA alleges the proposed town boundaries were "drawn just to encircle" its facility near Granbury, giving the new municipality regulatory power to "tax and regulate it out of business."
- Violation of State Law: The suit argues that the county violated multiple provisions of the Texas Local Government Code regarding municipal incorporations, including requirements for population, boundaries, and pre-existing community status.
- Collusion: MARA's filing implies that County Judge Ron Massingill, County Attorney Matt Mills, and Elections Administrator Stephanie Cooper worked with the opposing residents (like the group Citizens Concerned About Wolf Hollow) to improperly fast-track the measure onto the ballot.
📰 Status Update as of November 4, 2025📰 Status Update as of November 4, 2025
Judge Reed O'Connor denied MARA's request to block the election.
- The Ruling: On Monday, November 3, 2025, Judge O'Connor denied MARA's Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) to halt the election scheduled for today.
- The Reasoning: The judge ruled that MARA failed to prove a "substantial threat of irreparable harm" and noted that the issuance of an injunction would "disserve the public interest" by interfering with a public election.
- The Next Battle: Judge O'Connor explicitly stated that MARA can still challenge the validity of the election and the creation of the city after the results are certified.
Conclusion: The election to incorporate Mitchell Bend is proceeding today, November 4, 2025. The lawsuit itself will now pivot to challenging the legitimacy of the entire incorporation process in court.
reply
The law firm is called Earth justice? I'm siding with Mara. I own shares of Mara, another coincidence.
From Gemini:
📰 Judge Denies MARA's Request to Block Election
A federal judge in Fort Worth has denied Marathon Digital Holdings' (MARA) request for a temporary restraining order to block the November 4 election in Hood County, Texas, which includes a measure for the municipal incorporation of Mitchell Bend.
Here is a summary of the situation:
The incorporation effort, if approved by the residents, would create a Type B municipality in Texas, granting the new city the authority to enact local ordinances, such as noise regulations, to address the concerns of the community regarding the Bitcoin mine.
The federal judge in Fort Worth who denied MARA's request for a temporary restraining order was:
🏛️ Case Citation Information🏛️ Case Citation Information
The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas (Fort Worth Division).
While the full citation for the ruling on the Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) would follow a specific legal format (which is not immediately available in the public news reports), the case itself is formally titled:
The ruling was a Denial of the Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) against the defendants.
⚖️ Status of MARA's Federal Lawsuit⚖️ Status of MARA's Federal Lawsuit
While Judge Reed O'Connor denied MARA's emergency request to block the election, the core federal lawsuit filed by Marathon Digital Holdings against Hood County officials is still active and moving forward.
Here is what we know about the ongoing case:
In essence, the legal fight has moved from a pre-election attempt to block the vote to a post-election challenge to invalidate the new city itself and its subsequent regulatory authority over the mine.
Other Related Legal ChallengesOther Related Legal Challenges
It's important to note that this is only one of the legal challenges facing the Bitcoin mine: