pull down to refresh
47 sats \ 2 replies \ @adlai 5 Nov
Thanks for sharing this.
The updated BIP draft lives on github: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0003.md
It's a long read; for folks unfamiliar with these, the lowest-number BIPs lay out more fundamental aspects of social governance and consensus, while higher numbers are generally more niche and technical extensions.
One thing I found weird is the following sentence:
Doesn't the first clause mean that nobody would ever disclose using LLMs? I guess maybe they want disclosures even if people used LLMs for summarising e.g. mailing list discussions when conducting research.
reply
152 sats \ 1 reply \ @Murch OP 5 Nov
We have been getting a lot of submissions that are almost entirely LLM generated. We consider such BIPs low-quality and a waste of time. I don’t have an issue with people using LLMs to improve their language or grammar, when they come up with the content: the concept, motivation, rationale, design, and specification must come from the authors.
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @adlai 6 Nov
"Bullshit is an order of magnitude easier to generate than refute" and the situation is only made worse by people who paste LLMs output without even labelling it as such.
Thank you for the work you've been doing, defending against slop of both varieties!
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @Scoresby 5 Nov
Yeah baby!
reply