We stand on the edge of a transformation that very few are examining with the depth it requires.
Everyone is looking at Artificial Intelligence:
more powerful models, autonomous agents, new digital economies...yet the most uncomfortable question is avoided (or ignored):
๐ถ๐ป ๐๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ๐บ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐๐ฎ๐น๐๐ฒ ๐๐ถ๐น๐น ๐ฎ ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐น๐ฑ ๐ผ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ป๐ผ๐บ๐ถ๐ฐ ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐ ๐๐ถ๐น๐น ๐ป๐ผ ๐น๐ผ๐ป๐ด๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฏ๐ฒ ๐ผ๐ป๐น๐ ๐ต๐๐บ๐ฎ๐ป?
Look at whatโs emerging:
instant micropayments to access data or APIs; agents that sell output (code, analysis, content) and get paid per request; devices bargaining with each other (machine-to-machine) for energy, bandwidth, or updates; adaptive paywalls.
Itโs a software-native economy.
The problem is that we still rely on financial infrastructures built on anthropocentric assumptions:
bank accounts tied to jurisdictions, credit cards tied to personal identity, regulators imposing borders.
But AI has no passports: an agent operating in Germany wonโt wait for business hours, weekdays, currency conversions, and the approval of 9 banking intermediaries to interact with an agent in Australia.
We need a currency native to cyberspace. Credit cards donโt scale between machines; national currencies donโt scale in a nationless economy.
We need a currency native to cyberspace. Credit cards donโt scale between machines; national currencies donโt scale in a nationless economy.
Bitcoin, with Lightning, does.
And this isnโt speculation:
MCP servers already exist that allow agents to control Lightning wallets: AIs can own, spend, and earn.
The real question is whether we are culturally ready for a world where value flows between non-human intelligences without asking for permission.
If AI is the new actor in history, Bitcoin is the tool that will allow it to participate in the economy.
Not understanding Bitcoin today means not understanding the grammar of the future.