pull down to refresh

I was very interested about reading "The Gold Standard", until I was asked by some stackers to review his critics on Milei. The fact all of his articles on the matter were complete and absolute bullshit, down to every letter, made me seriously doubt any of his other works. I mean, I know what to criticize about Milei's movement myself because I lived it in first person, I was part of it. There are actual things that can be said. I do it myself on twitter all the time. There are severe flaws that still pose an existential risk to the movement. Yet, while perfectly valid points exist, not only Saifedean skillfully managed to tackle none, but devoted exclusively to distort, and at some points outright lying, on all and every single of the points he treated. His articles are so perfectly wrong, so densely wrong, and he expressed such a prodigious combo of ignorance and misunderstanding with such a level of hubris, that I could not take him seriously at anything anymore.
No. Not even close. Instead of posting my thoughts on this here, I've writen another post: Is Javier Milei, the "libertarian" president of Argentina, a complete fraud?
reply
I'm answering there then.
reply
Checks out.
reply