Sort of. He's saying that it's weird to plunge what's supposed to be 1:1 dollar into non-dollar denominated assets (with crazy volatility)
entirely, since a) banks aren't 0 reserve -- don't get hung up on that non-binding Fed announcement a few years ago -- b) Tether isn't regulated like a bank (I think?) or having support of the LOLR, so presumably that there's a different level of risk if you promise a 1-for-1 stablecoin (that somehow no longer is one for one).
But in practice, yes you're right: nothing bad will come of this since the run has to be SO GODDAMN MASSIVE for them to be in actual trouble.
newsletterhunt link at the bottom.
But in practice, yes you're right: nothing bad will come of this since the run has to be SO GODDAMN MASSIVE for them to be in actual trouble.