pull down to refresh

102 sats \ 7 replies \ @k00b 11h \ on: Why Bitcoin is in a Lose-Lose situation with the BIP-444 Soft Fork bitcoin
Too much pleb slop to wade through. False dichotomy too; the Lose-Lose is two branches the llm prompter cherrypicks. The right thing to question is the premise, ie "something needs to be done, bitcoin needs saving."
Let Bitcoin's Karens create Bitcoin Karen, join them or not, and carry on.
If you are satisfied by policy changes, help out libbitcoinkernel or not, and carry on.
write
preview
10 sats \ 2 replies \ @d01abcb3eb OP 11h
I've actually read the whole thing. I really recommend it. What the author argues is that even if there is no code change there is a suffering of loss due to the fact that we are where we are as a consequence of Core v30 having opened Pandoras Box.
reply
50 sats \ 0 replies \ @028559d218 11h
There is no "core v30" pandora's box it's nonsense.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b 10h
imo the only thing Core v30 did give people desperate to start a coup a poor excuse to start one.
You might feel like a coup is necessary too which is cool. I think coups are good for bitcoin. I'm not part of this coup though.
reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @SimpleStacker 11h
do some people just shamelessly copy and paste from AI and call it a blog post...?
reply
30 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b 11h
yes. have poor taste -> make pleb slop -> yum, and it was so easy that i feel great about myself, other people will love it -> attempt to share your pride
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @SimpleStacker 11h
feelsbadman
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @d01abcb3eb OP 11h
Yeah, indeed. I also think the author uses LLMs. However, so do some (mostly?) respected scientists. As long as the author accepts the responsibility of the produced text I can't blame them. I mean, equivalently, an expert programmer vibe coding is ok as long as it's still his/her head that rolls if there are faults.
reply