pull down to refresh
100 sats \ 7 replies \ @Cje95 2h \ parent \ on: Researchers question Anthropic claim that AI-assisted attack was 90% autonomous AI
I should rephrase what I said.... I am surprised that whoever manipulated the code wasnt able to disguise it better to avoid detection. I also question how long it took them to detect it. They frame it as the quickly identified it (or at least that is how I read it) and that runs counter to how most of this goes. Hell if anything was this possibly done by the group to cause a panic because again it was detected and based on how I am reading it it was quickly detected.
reply
reply
reply
I also question how long it took them to detect it. They frame it as the quickly identified it (or at least that is how I read it) and that runs counter to how most of this goes.
In mid-September 2025, we detected suspicious activity that later investigation determined to be a highly sophisticated espionage campaign.
Is two months considered fast?
reply
It was 2 months to notify the public but once it was detected these companies notify those 30 entities. They dont really state how long the action could have been taking place. For instance with Brave's research into AI browsers prompt injection attacks the Brave team notifies the company and has waited typically a couple of weeks before releasing the information publicly.
reply