pull down to refresh

I got interested and asked myself what the evolutionary purpose of anger is. I found this:
The recalibration theory of anger suggests that anger serves an evolutionary purpose by motivating individuals to address perceived injustices and violations of social norms. Anger functions as a recalibration mechanism, signaling when individuals' goals or expectations have been thwarted and prompting them to take corrective action.
Central to this psychological model is the idea that anger is not merely a destructive force but a strategic tool that can be employed to negotiate social hierarchies, assert boundaries, and protect one's interests. Anger is seen as an adaptive response that has evolved to promote survival and reproductive success. By mobilizing physiological and psychological resources, anger enables individuals to confront challenges and overcome obstacles in their environment.
This matches my experience of how anger can be useful. When somebody is angry with me, I make sure to take them serious and ask myself if I indeed did something wrong.
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @ek 15 Nov
Anger has also helped me assist a woman who was being treated badly by another man. While everyone on the train was shocked that he was threatening to hit her and she was crying, I stood up and told him to back off. It didn’t help much, because she still got off the train with him, but I just couldn’t watch that injustice.
However, I’m also very aware of how the bystander effect works (part of my training as a paramedic), so I don’t blame the other people on the train. I also didn’t feel like I would be putting my life on the line; otherwise, I probably wouldn’t have stood up, either.
So with asserting boundaries via anger, it’s not just your own boundaries, but also the boundaries of others.
reply
Wouldn't this have been possible without anger? I guess it depends what is meant by anger. Anger at injustice but directed in a controlled way can be good. I don't know if uncontrolled anger can ever be good, except maybe as a survival instinct
reply
Marie Antoinette would agree!
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 15 Nov
Wouldn't this have been possible without anger?
Sure, it would just have been more difficult. Anger helps to act now, and not get analysis paralysis.
Anger at injustice but directed in a controlled way can be good. I don't know if uncontrolled anger can ever be good, except maybe as a survival instinct
I agree
reply