pull down to refresh

Cooling would be achieved through a thermal system of heat pipes and radiators while operating at nominal temperatures.
Wish they had real details on this part. It's why we're not mining Bitcoin in space.
100 sats \ 7 replies \ @k00b 17 Nov
@petertodd wrote about mining bitcoin in space and we'd need to underclock or spread the heated surface area by a factor of 6400.
reply
100 sats \ 1 reply \ @optimism 17 Nov
Yeah I remember that post, it was a good one. I'm not saying that it's impossible. Just: does it make actual economic sense as long as we haven't even really started building vertical data centers? We're still very much 2D and Microsoft's latest "super data center" (#1281419) has been lauded for z{1..2}.
reply
100 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b 17 Nov
True. I was surprised that the second floor was notable.
Perhaps when there's an advantage to gathering raw materials and manufacturing GPUs/ASICs and solar panels in space, this kind of thing makes more sense.
reply
If we’re going to use chips in that package, we need to spread that heat. Roughly speaking, we need to spread the heat from a 1cm2 area to a 80cm2, or a circle with a radius of 5cm2.
That's a factor of 80, how do you get 6400?
reply
Good catch, I somehow glanced over it and in my mind did @k00b's (wrong) explanation below too.
reply
area = length * width
reply
200 sats \ 1 reply \ @Scroogey 17 Nov
You're saying 80 cm^2 is 6400 times the area of 1 cm^2?
reply
121 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b 17 Nov
oh lol you're right. i read that as "1x1cm and 80x80cm" rather than 1 and 80 square centimeters. i don't know why i did that.
reply
I was going to ask that and I saw you asked it; besides asking, there was a whole technical explanation that I don't understand. It would be good to mine in space; the hard part is building the rocket.
reply