pull down to refresh

I feel them, but I'm not that sympathetic. You cannot sue other musicians if you have had an influence on their style; how is AI any different? The degree to which AI copies any individual artist is probably even less than the degree to which a human artist is influenced by another human artist. I think it is the commercialized aspect of AI copying that feels bad, since there is no real human artistry involved behind it. But shouldn't the market decide whether it likes AI slop or not? I hope people are discerning enough to reject it.
100 sats \ 0 replies \ @kepford 13h
Yep, the IP blade cuts both ways.
The other thing is that technology destroys business models. Always has, always will. You can't stop it.
reply
I hope people are discerning enough to reject it.
I fell for the AI slop in music and realized it only after I searched to see when a particular song was released since I knew the artist and the songs of that artist. It was a particular key that I heard only after a few replays of the song, that caught my attention and made me think it's AI.
reply
I think I fell for it too, but only when I was looking for lofi-style background music for studying. It's not any music that I'd ever pay for or go to a concert for
reply