pull down to refresh
nice lil rhetorical question.
mmmm. nah, he doesn't. He can just fiddle along being an intelligence business exec
reply
I'd say that it depends on his level of certainty.
reply
Yeah?
reply
You shouldn't invest in a mad scientist unless you trust his vision.
reply
I get how it’s zero sum, but given that it’s zero sum, isn’t being the one who dumps fiat the hardest the prudent move?
It’s not Saylor’s fault that fiat’s failing and if he knows it’s failing doesn’t he have a fiduciary responsibility to short it?