pull down to refresh

TL:DR (Didn’t post the entire article it is quite long)
In liquid-bearing concrete structures, joints are where protective linings fail first. A monolithic film is asked to span a moving gap and stay bonded to both sides through thermal swings, settlement, hydrostatic loads, and start-stop operations. Over thousands of cycles, stress concentrates at the arris; micro-pinhole strings and edge-shear accumulate until the first callbacks show up — always at joints
Why Joints Beat Monolithic Films (Quick Mechanics)
Differential movement. Adjacent pours and wall-to-slab interfaces move independently. Typical thermal expansion alone in a 100-ft. wall across a 20° F swing produces approximately 1/8 in. of movement. Repeat that across seasonal and operational cycles and fatigue is inevitable — especially where you've got foundation settlement, soft soils, or structures built on expansive clay.
Stress concentration. Continuous films focus strain at sharp edges where small flaws become crack starters. Even a microscopic imperfection in surface prep becomes the failure point when subjected to thousands of movement cycles.
Fatigue and adhesion limits. Even high-elongation elastomers fatigue under cyclic shear at joint interfaces. Rigid films split or debond. The coating chemistry might be excellent, but physics wins every time when movement concentrates at a single point.
The Joint-Integrated Detail (What Actually Works)
Instead of trying to glue two moving parts together and hoping adhesion holds, a joint-integrated detail creates a controlled chase and bridges it with reinforcement that's fully wetted with resin and tied into the field coating. Movement happens beneath the lining; the composite bridge carries strain without pulling the coating apart.

Spec & QC Cheat Sheet

Standards Referenced

Surface preparation:

ICRI 310.2R (Concrete surface profile guidance) SSPC-SP13/NACE No. 6 (Surface preparation of concrete) Moisture testing:
ASTM F2170 (In-situ concrete relative humidity) ASTM F1869 (Moisture vapor emission rate) ASTM F3010 (Moisture vapor barrier qualification) Quality control:
ASTM D7234 (Pull-off adhesion on concrete) ASTM D5162 (Holiday/continuity testing) ASTM D6132 (Ultrasonic DFT measurement on non-metallic substrates) ASTM D4138 (Destructive DFT measurement) Disinfection (potable water):
AWWA C652 (Disinfection of water storage facilities) Acceptance and Documentation Checklist

Moisture verification:

□ Record ASTM F2170 relative humidity readings □ Record ASTM F1869 MVER if specified □ Confirm readings within primer manufacturer limits □ Document environmental conditions during testing

Surface profile:

□ Note target ICRI CSP (typically 3-5 for elastomeric systems) □ Capture comparator chip photos showing achieved profile □ Document areas requiring additional prep or repair Adhesion testing:
□ Map pull locations per ASTM D7234 (minimum 3 pulls per 500-1,000 sq ft) □ Add targeted pulls at joint zones and transitions □ Log failure mode (concrete failure = pass; coating delamination = investigate) □ Photo-document all test locations and results

Thickness verification:

□ In-process wet film checks with gauge □ Final DFT by ASTM D6132 (ultrasonic preferred) or D4138 where allowed □ Record readings by zone (field areas vs. joint zones) □ Verify minimum DFT achieved across entire surface

Holiday testing:

□ Select test method: spark or wet sponge per ASTM D5162 □ Set voltage per standard chart based on actual installed DFT □ Note electrode type and travel speed □ Mark and repair all detected holidays □ Retest repairs and document passing results Handover packet:
□ Surface prep before/after photos by area □ Complete WFT/DFT logs organized by zone □ Cure time verification records □ Adhesion test map with all results □ Holiday testing report including repairs □ Environmental monitoring logs (temp, RH, dew point) □ For potable systems: AWWA C652 disinfection certificate

My Thoughts 💭

Fantastic article about the design and application of concrete joints!! Some of the pitfalls (not using enough coating due reinforcement) that leads to failures was quite interesting. I never had the privilege to inspect a concrete job but it is nice to know what to look for if I ever have to.