TL:DR (Didn’t post the entire article it is quite long)In liquid-bearing concrete structures,
joints are where protective linings fail first. A monolithic film is asked to span a moving gap and stay bonded to both sides through thermal swings, settlement, hydrostatic loads, and start-stop operations. Over thousands of cycles, stress concentrates at the arris; micro-pinhole strings and edge-shear accumulate until the first callbacks show up — always at jointsWhy Joints Beat Monolithic Films (Quick Mechanics)
Differential movement. Adjacent pours and wall-to-slab interfaces move independently. Typical thermal expansion alone in a 100-ft. wall across a 20° F swing produces approximately 1/8 in. of movement. Repeat that across seasonal and operational cycles and fatigue is inevitable — especially where you've got foundation settlement, soft soils, or structures built on expansive clay.
Stress concentration. Continuous films focus strain at sharp edges where small flaws become crack starters. Even a microscopic imperfection in surface prep becomes the failure point when subjected to thousands of movement cycles.
Fatigue and adhesion limits. Even high-elongation elastomers fatigue under cyclic shear at joint interfaces. Rigid films split or debond. The coating chemistry might be excellent, but physics wins every time when movement concentrates at a single point.
The Joint-Integrated Detail (What Actually Works)
Instead of trying to glue two moving parts together and hoping adhesion holds, a joint-integrated detail creates a controlled chase and bridges it with reinforcement that's fully wetted with resin and tied into the field coating. Movement happens beneath the lining; the composite bridge carries strain without pulling the coating apart.
Spec & QC Cheat Sheet
Standards Referenced
Surface preparation:
ICRI 310.2R (Concrete surface profile guidance)
SSPC-SP13/NACE No. 6 (Surface preparation of concrete)
Moisture testing:
ASTM F2170 (In-situ concrete relative humidity)
ASTM F1869 (Moisture vapor emission rate)
ASTM F3010 (Moisture vapor barrier qualification)
Quality control:
ASTM D7234 (Pull-off adhesion on concrete)
ASTM D5162 (Holiday/continuity testing)
ASTM D6132 (Ultrasonic DFT measurement on non-metallic substrates)
ASTM D4138 (Destructive DFT measurement)
Disinfection (potable water):
AWWA C652 (Disinfection of water storage facilities)
Acceptance and Documentation Checklist
Moisture verification:
□ Record ASTM F2170 relative humidity readings
□ Record ASTM F1869 MVER if specified
□ Confirm readings within primer manufacturer limits
□ Document environmental conditions during testing
Surface profile:
□ Note target ICRI CSP (typically 3-5 for elastomeric systems)
□ Capture comparator chip photos showing achieved profile
□ Document areas requiring additional prep or repair
Adhesion testing:
□ Map pull locations per ASTM D7234 (minimum 3 pulls per 500-1,000 sq ft)
□ Add targeted pulls at joint zones and transitions
□ Log failure mode (concrete failure = pass; coating delamination = investigate)
□ Photo-document all test locations and results
Thickness verification:
□ In-process wet film checks with gauge
□ Final DFT by ASTM D6132 (ultrasonic preferred) or D4138 where allowed
□ Record readings by zone (field areas vs. joint zones)
□ Verify minimum DFT achieved across entire surface
Holiday testing:
□ Select test method: spark or wet sponge per ASTM D5162
□ Set voltage per standard chart based on actual installed DFT
□ Note electrode type and travel speed
□ Mark and repair all detected holidays
□ Retest repairs and document passing results
Handover packet:
□ Surface prep before/after photos by area
□ Complete WFT/DFT logs organized by zone
□ Cure time verification records
□ Adhesion test map with all results
□ Holiday testing report including repairs
□ Environmental monitoring logs (temp, RH, dew point)
□ For potable systems: AWWA C652 disinfection certificate
My Thoughts 💭
Fantastic article about the design and application of concrete joints!! Some of the pitfalls (not using enough coating due reinforcement) that leads to failures was quite interesting. I never had the privilege to inspect a concrete job but it is nice to know what to look for if I ever have to.