Intriguingly, earlier the same day that Bloomberg later published their report, Russia’s Foreign Intelligence Service warned that the UK “aims to undermine Trump’s efforts to resolve the conflict by discrediting him.” Readers will recall the UK’s role in Russiagate, which they conspired with the CIA, FBI, and the Clinton camp to cook up to against him.
pull down to refresh
related posts
45 sats \ 2 replies \ @optimism 16h
The comments on the source substack on this one are kind of wild.
reply
109 sats \ 1 reply \ @siggy47 OP 16h
Can you give us a little taste of the ones you find interesting? I was just checking them out.
reply
36 sats \ 0 replies \ @optimism 5h
Sorry wasn't at my desk and I can't do this on a phone haha
- "Geostrategically, my view has been that the UK wants to keep Russia and the EU divided and then further divide the EU in order to restore de facto control over Continental Europe by proxy." - that's definitely an out of the box view
- "It looks to me like this mixture of actions will inevitably provoke a kinetic response from China/Russia at some point in the near future." - kinetic response to the US or UK? wut?
- "Events and acts keep coming to the surface showing that the Gangs of Homicidal/Suicidal Maniacs that operate below the surface in Western governments are aiming for a planetary nuclear war." - this entire response is golden
- "Starmer may be unpopular, but so what? His orders are carried out just the same." - wait, politicians are at the top now? lol. If you want to do a covert op, the last person you tell is the politician.
There's also a whole thread on the history of the UK and that this is why Starmer must have ordered taps and leaks.
reply
36 sats \ 0 replies \ @SimpleStacker 14h
This is something that I've heard bits and pieces of over the years, but what is the UK's strategic interest in undermining peace in Ukraine?
reply
36 sats \ 1 reply \ @0xbitcoiner 15h
The real question is, who leaked the transcripts? Putin or Trump?
reply
33 sats \ 0 replies \ @siggy47 OP 15h
Neither. This was a third party.
reply