pull down to refresh

Obsidian is good, make sure you categorize and tags ideas. I'd not aim to write up long essays in one go, just write small ideas and fill the metadata for each. When zooming out (with the graph view) you'll see a bunch of ideas together under the same topic and that, with a bit of rework, will make for a great article.
the way i manage to shorten the story is by referencing several existing stories and prior posts; obviously if i spell out every single idea myself, the write-up will be huge, and people will end up reading passively instead of investigating the territory; the map of ideas for my Parasite Wars series is definitely starting to explode, as i have to fill-in pieces for the future chapters as well; i may have to rewrite some, especially the introduction, after i finish with the bulk of my content;
i am also hesitant to publish the next piece, since, altho not the hardest-hitting, it's pretty extreme: the reality stranger than fiction; it's tough to keep the facts straight as well as to mix in speculation and the esoteric concepts which are typically dismissed as "crazy talk;" at the same time, a lot of it is still a theory, albeit quite convincing;
reply
I’ve been working on researching about how effective is fasting to rid the body of parasites and its history in the Bible but I have not found any concrete studies yet. And the Bible only correlates fasting to the expelling of demons; which makes me wonder if by demons they really meant parasites?
reply
to see something that cannot be seen with the naked eye, many allegories and myths have been created; obviously almost all of them have failed, because the parasites have reset the population a few times already;
reply
that's exactly why you should keep it short and concise.
reply
my work on stacker.news is my scratchpad; whether it gets the high number of sats or views on stacker.news is irrelevant; i am condensing tomes of information into a sub-10 min preliminary read-through, not counting the referenced posts and sources; this information will later be broken down by influencers into more digestible pieces; i am not creating content for the majority, but for the minority that thirsts for knowledge; to be fair, some of my quick comments with illustrations are worth a separate post;
reply
A 10min read pieces sounds fair, considering the topics. Is the "influencers braking down information" something planned or something you expect to happen?
some of my quick comments with illustrations are worth a separate post It will probably help a ton to separate them.
reply
Jack Kruse, for example, shares hardcore scientific material that is hard to process, but at least it's coming from the left-brain perspective, so it has linear logic - his followers break down his teachings in a linear fashion;
my content requires both linear and parallel logic, as well as abstract thot, so idk how the followers will break it down for others - my teaching targets are the holistic thinkers and those who, altho leaning toward the left or right-brain modes of thot, are capable of holistic processing of information; it still requires a small leap of faith;
what i am going to do for now is group some comments together under a relevant post or create some posts of references only; i stopped looking at stacker.news as a social interaction protocol and rather as a workbook open to all; if Leonardo da Vinci were alive, he wud probably use stacker.news and github to spread his ideas for feedback;
P.S. it's too bad the stacker.news doesn't have a draft solution right now (besides saving the latest draft), so i am working with what i got;
reply