Engage here in this dialogue and show you can make a credible reasoned rebuttal here.

Don't think a litany of referrals to other dialogues demonstrates a credible sequential retort- it does not...its just more cowardly mendacious evasion of a engagement in a true contest of ideas.

Do it here now,in context, responding to the facts and issues raised here, in good faith, or concede defeat, by default.

BTW have just looked at a few of the references you gave- yes in some cases you make valid and worthwhile counter points though rarely refuting the points I was making but rather more generally broadening the scope of the dialogue than directly refuting my arguments.

Engage in context and as always I will try to respond. Fail to engage in context and I will call you for conceding by default.