pull down to refresh

Dude has aaaa point:

"It’s all very well bemoaning the growing economic nihilism of younger generations — and the evidence bears it out — but they’re just playing the cards they have been dealt."


It has become a rite of passage for every new generation of young adults to be labelled lazy and irresponsible by its elders, but Gen Z has probably had it worse than most. Accusations range from not making an effort at work to splurging on luxuries and a “Yolo” attitude to risky investments like cryptocurrencies and NFTs.
Yes, yes, every generation gets shit flung at them unreasonably often. BUT, says
There are two important differences between Gen Z and those previous generations facing similar disdain. The first is that rather than pushing back on these characterisations, today’s 20-somethings have tended to embrace them, leaning into neologisms such as “quiet quitting”. The second is that new evidence suggests these behaviours are rational responses to worsening economic prospects: specifically, the increasing unattainability of home ownership.

It's not our fault the housing market is rigged; we're just fixing it by fixing the money

In a pioneering study published last week, economists at the University of Chicago and Northwestern University used detailed data on the card transactions, wealth and attitudes of Americans to demonstrate that** reduced work effort, increased leisure spending and investment in risky financial assets** (including crypto) are all disproportionately common among young adults who face little to no realistic prospect of being able to afford a house.
Same in the USSR UK:
Young British renters who have little hope of cobbling together a deposit are much more likely to take financial risks — with online betting, for example — than their contemporaries who are on or within reach of the housing ladder.
As housing affordability deteriorates, those who come to believe they are locked out of home ownership resort to a mixture of high-risk bets and what US economic commentator Kyla Scanlon calls “financial nihilism” — why strive and save when it won’t be enough to make it anyway? — while their better-placed counterparts tighten their belts.
Again, high sympathy points here.
Housing _un_affordability, courtesy of a broken money and a corrupt, oversized government, are hurling people into pretty irresponsible financial behavior. Then again, the small portion of them that find bitcoin and help correct the errors of the past generation are doing much more than yolo-ing away their life in financial nihilism.

It’s funny that it’s taken so long to reach the obvious conclusion that people aren’t putting forth effort because there’s little reward for doing so.
This is one of the first things experimental economists check for when they see lack of effort.
reply
nah, it's all broken broken. I put in effort at the ballot box.

HOT GIRLS FOR MAMDANI!

reply
The part of this I don't get it why said young people can't move to other, cheaper parts of the country? The phrase "Go west, young man" comes to mind. Not everyone has to live in London or New York. Is it a feature of the labor market? Are jobs now entirely concentrated in expensive cities?
reply
Yup, I ask myself this too. All the jobs are remote anyway, just leave bros
reply
38 sats \ 3 replies \ @anon 13h
Unpopular opinion but John Burn-Murdoch is AGAIN 100% correct
If we had actual free market capitalism in the housing sector, people were free to build on their property what they want, prices for a house would be like 50k.
If that was true the number of Bitcoiners would be a small fraction of what it is. And the Bitcoin price would still be $100. Nobody would care our monetary system is fundamentally broken.
reply
Knock me over with a feather: true... but irrelevant.
If our monetary system wasn't fundamentally broken, bitcoin wouldn't be a thing? Like DUUUH, of course
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @anon 11h
If our monetary system wasn't fundamentally broken, bitcoin wouldn't be a thing?
That's not what I said. I said if the housing market wasn't fundamentally broken, nobody would care that the monetary system is fundamentally broken.
reply
Well, but they're largely the same statements...?
The housing market is broken in large parts because the money is broken
reply
33 sats \ 0 replies \ @supratic 14h
lol, more people than we thought is hodling then. It's probably the inverse, Gen-Z see "crypto" as a more sustainable way to save. The house market crash accordingly.
reply