pull down to refresh

I don't really disagree with the underlying point, but have lots of small disagreements otherwise:
  • The "normalization of deviance" is a direct result of the "Loss of God" of secular society. There is no way to have one without the other...its baked into the cake.
  • In a very very analogous way the "safety of LLMs" is a mirror of this...A LLM is just statistical token generation machine, its going to generate output based upon its training data. If you want a LLM to be "realistic" then you need to train it on realistic human conversation, which will include unsafe thoughts. Its unfortunately again, baked into the cake.
I'm not meaning this to be picky of the the researcher, but would she agree to live in a non-secular society? Being a professor I somehow doubt it.