Human psychology is herd-like and has proven to exhibit periods of euphoria and fear.
A new monetary asset that regularly grows in both popularity and usefulness will always be volatile - that's just human nature.
The establishment will fight to suppress it and instill fear, uncertainty and doubt in all participants. Even without intervention, volatility is part of the course as Bitcoin's price goes too high during bull runs.
Gold was similarly volatile during the Weimar Republic's hyperinflation. Notice how the monthly percentage change was all over the place - many times more volatile than Bitcoin today.
In theory, we should expect Bitcoin to be even more volatile than this during extreme periods.
One can expect volatility when a freely chosen unit monetizes through market processes. Bitcoin’s volatility is further not surprising because it:
  1. is still not widely understood
  2. is still in early stages of development (Lightning, etc.)
  3. derives value from government instability, which itself increases market uncertainty and market volatility
  4. has uncertain expectations of future utility (esp. amidst regulatory clarity).
So next time someone rehashes the same old argument against Bitcoin - "it's too volatile" - tell them that's expected. Not only that - it's good.
Unless Bitcoin becomes heavily manipulated or human nature changes, a new monetary asset that regularly grows in both popularity and usefulness will always be volatile.
To complain that nobody will use Bitcoin because it’s volatile is to say
“Bitcoin’s adoption rate is so astonishingly fast that it will never be popular!“
If Bitcoin were less volatile, would it have an even more rapid adoption rate?
Bitcoin’s price has to go up as more people start using it, and if a lot of new people start using it, then it has to go up fast (that is, be volatile).
Unlike everything else, a higher price for Bitcoin does not reduce its utility - you just trade with smaller amounts.
In fact, a higher price makes it more useful because more people want to use it.
There is no reason to think that Bitcoin will stabilize in terms of other currencies. Once Bitcoin starts killing the other currencies, it will still be volatile, which will still indicate its success.
-- parts of this is an excerpt from the 2-minute version of Bitcoin Hypermonetization: Bubble Talk (2013), originally posted in https://www.2minutebitcoin.org/blog/bitcoin-hypermonetization-bubble-talk-2013 and another part is an excerpt from the 2-minute version of I Love Bitcoin's Volatility (2014) accessible here https://www.2minutebitcoin.org/blog/i-love-bitcoins-volatility
I love the volatility and eat up the dips!
reply
биткоин движется в двух направлениях... это хорошо... но есть одно Но... монеты не увеличиваются... значит когда 75% людей поймёт что это... будет просто рост вверх без откатов и остановок... 2032 год... у тебя ещё есть время заполнить свой адрес сатоши
reply
i find myself coming to the conclusion that some sort of 'hyperbitcoinization' while not yet inevitable, has become entirely likley. while the prospects of this are more than exciting...i have dampered my unbridled enthuasiam after further consideration about the chaos that would ensue as a result of this. lots and lots of people are gonna get killed (both literally and figuratively) if and when this happens.
Also, semi-related, i have noticed the media, governments and fudsters trying to kneecap adoption. i used to think this was a problem, but i started to believe that this may be a bit of a blessing. the LN is not fully ready to be a universal payments layer and the base layer is not very scalable. growing too fast could break shit and lead to a huge setback. every attack vector against bitcoin that does not succeed makes bitcoin stronger and i wonder if too much success, too fast, could prove to be a bad thing.
Overall i think you did a good job explaining why volitility is a good thing, and I agree completely
reply
media, governments and fudsters trying to kneecap adoption
Yet bitcoin persists. I find it entertaining, if nothing else, seeing how nearly every argument they come up with can be countered rationally.
  • Bitcoin mining takes too much energy?
    Truth: Bitcoin helps subsidize green/renewable energy, and elsewhere mitigates problems with flaring (or worse, venting) of waste gas. Bitcoin is a net gain.
  • Bitcoin is slow.
    Truth: Lightning is fast, and incredible cheap to use.
  • Bitcoin is volatile.
    Truth: Well, they got us on that one. Your $10 worth of bitcoin bought a a little over a month ago is worth $14 today. Who in this world wants that?
    But seriously, not everyone can (or wants to) stomach the opposite of the above happening (where bitcoin drops in value 40% in a month). They want to use bitcoin to pay their landlord or whatever, and do not want exposure to the exchange rate risk that comes from holding bitcoin.
    But there are solutions for that. Valet's LN wallet (by Anton Gushcha) which uses StableSats synthetic USD. Or Kollider's LN wallet. Or bitcoin can be swapped from bitcoin to Tether USD on Liquid network, for example.
    These are convenient and very low-cost methods to swap in to (and out of) fiat equivalents, for those who want (or need) to purchasing power protection for some (or all) of their savings.
reply
we think it's good that adoption isn't incredibly fast - and so far it has still been at a very fast, yet reasonable pace. This way it only attracts the smartest most independent thinkers first
reply