100%. That might change if somehow BTC achieves its destiny before I die (I expect it to be slower, tbh), and I'm leaving her a genuine fortune, as I believe being too rich without earning a thing makes people into pretty awful folks (examples: Literally every single child of a rich person, from Paris Hilton to Donald Trump Jr.).
But if it's something that can provide some form of basic nest egg or enhance her own stack enough to help give her stability? Yeah, it's hers.
yet another meaningless poll that ignores proper definitions; all children ultimately belong to a state, by definition;
the sons and daughters will inherit the earth terraformed by sovereign men & women who use bitcoin; living in bitcoin means using bitcoin and interacting thru bitcoin; 0-100% sats inheritance is almost meaningless; "mi bitcoin es su bitcoin," so to speak, if u are a proper straight-thinking man; with enough imagination, patience, & hard work, even 1000 sats can terraform mountains;
0%. First, they wouldn't know what to do with it since they have no interest in crypto. Second, they would lose half or all of it to fees or scams trying to liquidate it when they get it. And third, it's my retirement account, so I will have spent it before then.
It depends how much I need to spend myself.
Am already semi-retired and living 100% off Bitcoin savings.
The work I am still doing is not generating immediate cash flow.
Prefer to support them more in education while they are young and to make their own fortunes than to expect anything from me.