428 sats \ 2 replies \ @jeff 7 Feb 2023 \ parent \ on: Of regrets bitcoin
They are claiming that there is a fiduciary duty that is somehow tied to accessing their capital.
From the press release:
There has to be a bottoms-up, community way, to prove that the devs do not possess that fiduciary duty individually or in aggregate.
If I had the time, knowledge, power & control, I would send a PR to Bitcoin Core, that transfers all of Satoshi's UTXOs to Craig Wright, cut a release, then just see if people run the node. When they don't, boom! Irrefutable proof that the devs don't have the power or fiduciary duty to restore access to the funds.
I like this. You can count on me not to run that code ;)
reply
Hmm, for a million-coin payout, Creggy would spin up a Billion nodes using that code.
I know it wouldn't work, but boy could that cause some confusion & congestion. Best to skip this option. ;)
reply