pull down to refresh

Marks is a pretty interesting investor-commentator type. Very Ray Dalio, but might be less well known in these circles.
For some reason, he's out swining in the FT these days.
Why don't we learn from past bubbles?
that has not happened yet, and I am sure it never will. Memories are short, and prudence and natural risk aversion are no match for the dream of getting rich on the back of a revolutionary technology that 'everyone knows' will change the world.

"bubbles are what happen when enthusiasm reaches irrational proportions."

I haven’t met anyone who doesn’t believe AI has the potential to be one of the biggest technological developments of all time, reshaping both daily life and the global economy.
...guess dude didn't search too hard, eh?
Relevance?
We also know that in recent years, markets and economies have become increasingly dependent on it, with AI stocks driving most of the S&P 500’s gains and capital expenditure on industry capacity propping up US GDP growth. 
While the parallels with past bubbles are inescapable, believers in the technology will argue that “this time it’s different”. Those four words are heard in virtually every bubble, claiming that the current situation isn’t a bubble, unlike the analogous earlier ones.

and some nice all-round good assessment of debt
Debt is neither a good thing nor a bad thing per se. It all comes down to the proportion of debt in the capital structure, the quality of the assets or cash flows you’re lending against, borrowers’ alternative sources of liquidity for repayment, and the adequacy of the safety margin obtained by lenders.

33 sats \ 2 replies \ @unboiled 6h
There is a surprising amount of articles, also in major publications, being written about this bubble that allegedly no one else is seeing. Only the 5391 other authors. But no one else. Really.
reply
if everyone sees a bubble, it kind of isn't a bubble

"actually, no one can see a bubble; that's what makes it a bubble"

reply
if everyone sees a bubble, it kind of isn't a bubble
Well, realistically, I don't know of a time where really everyone saw it, but virtually everyone who mattered saw and wrote about the housing bubble for a long time. And it still was a bubble.
I recall seeing doomsday articles as early as 2005. It caught my eye back then because I had read irrational exuberance for the first time around 2001/2002, and my ears perked up when I saw the term being (re-)used more frequently to describe housing prices. For a considerable period before that, I only rarely came across that term in articles still mulling over the dotcom era.
reply
Has anyone ever done a history of "this time is different"?
I'd be interested how that's worked out over the course of financial history. I know not well, but it would be interesting to see what the actual track record looks like.
reply
69 sats \ 0 replies \ @Scoresby 15h
This would make a pretty great SN article...
Sadly I only do Bitcoin memes.
reply
I mean, Rogoff's book This Time is Different is pretty neat -- though not a sociological/prediction type history of the phrase, obvs.
My guess is: probably
reply
AI depends upon electricity- huge volumes of it. China today has a massive and growing advantage in electricity generation...giving it an inherent strategic advantage in the AI race.
~
Chinas massive lead on electricity generation gives it not only a huge advantage on AI but in virtually all industrial and post industrial areas of the economy.
reply
This AI bubble still has room to run
reply
We have had so many bubbles since 2009 we have grown numb to new ones occurring. It's a bit like that game meme, "Ah shit, here we go again."
reply
stackers have outlawed this. turn on wild west mode in your /settings to see outlawed content.