pull down to refresh

An entertaining and interesting read. It seems so plausible that I don't care if it's true or real. It rings true with my time working in IT / Tech.

The Story

Peter Girnus 🦅 @gothburz Last quarter I rolled out Microsoft Copilot to 4,000 employees.
$30 per seat per month.
$1.4 million annually.
I called it "digital transformation."
The board loved that phrase.
They approved it in eleven minutes.
No one asked what it would actually do.
Including me.
I told everyone it would "10x productivity."
That's not a real number.
But it sounds like one.
HR asked how we'd measure the 10x.
I said we'd "leverage analytics dashboards."
They stopped asking.
Three months later I checked the usage reports.
47 people had opened it.
12 had used it more than once.
One of them was me.
I used it to summarize an email I could have read in 30 seconds.
It took 45 seconds.
Plus the time it took to fix the hallucinations.
But I called it a "pilot success."
Success means the pilot didn't visibly fail.
The CFO asked about ROI.
I showed him a graph.
The graph went up and to the right.
It measured "AI enablement."
I made that metric up.
He nodded approvingly.
We're "AI-enabled" now.
I don't know what that means.
But it's in our investor deck.
A senior developer asked why we didn't use Claude or ChatGPT.
I said we needed "enterprise-grade security."
He asked what that meant.
I said "compliance."
He asked which compliance.
I said "all of them."
He looked skeptical.
I scheduled him for a "career development conversation."
He stopped asking questions.
Microsoft sent a case study team.
They wanted to feature us as a success story.
I told them we "saved 40,000 hours."
I calculated that number by multiplying employees by a number I made up.
They didn't verify it.
They never do.
Now we're on Microsoft's website.
"Global enterprise achieves 40,000 hours of productivity gains with Copilot."
The CEO shared it on LinkedIn.
He got 3,000 likes.
He's never used Copilot.
None of the executives have.
We have an exemption.
"Strategic focus requires minimal digital distraction."
I wrote that policy.
The licenses renew next month.
I'm requesting an expansion.
5,000 more seats.
We haven't used the first 4,000.
But this time we'll "drive adoption."
Adoption means mandatory training.
Training means a 45-minute webinar no one watches.
But completion will be tracked.
Completion is a metric.
Metrics go in dashboards.
Dashboards go in board presentations.
Board presentations get me promoted.
I'll be SVP by Q3.
I still don't know what Copilot does.
But I know what it's for.
It's for showing we're "investing in AI."
Investment means spending.
Spending means commitment.
Commitment means we're serious about the future.
The future is whatever I say it is.
As long as the graph goes up and to the right.
Paragraphs, bro
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @OT 8h
100%
reply
This just tells me that his management approach is being a car salesman, and the rest of the C-suite are idiots or complicit in the same behavior because they didn't want to rock the boat by asking deeper questions.
reply
Exactly... and this is not uncommon.
reply
This is the norm.
reply
Last startup I worked for literally sold itself to a bigger company on the basis of being "AI enabled" and failed to deliver. Parent company probably regretting the purchase.
@delete in 24 hours
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @optimism 10h
Last time I was hired to assess a vendor that claimed they were "AI enabled" it turned out that this meant that they just had a CTO and Replit.
I mean... it was true, the only thing that enabled them was an LLM. ~lol
@delete in 12 hours
reply
I don't think most people get how much smoke and mirrors are in tech. They used to call it vaporware
reply
51 sats \ 1 reply \ @Aeneas 8h
These are all signs of having too much money. When you're forced to deal with actual scarcity, you don't have time for this kind of idiocy.
reply
True
reply
69 sats \ 0 replies \ @optimism 12h
Sounds legit.
reply