
![](https://m.stacker.news/123230)

Absolutely loving this, by the way!

You read it right.

> That said, was trust also determined by someone’s downzapping skills?

Yes! Downzapping was a part of trust was calculated .

k00b

Downzaps are ~3x as powerful for influencing ranking as an equivalent amount sats upzapped or boosted

Am I interpreting this correctly? The wording is throwing me off. A downzap is three times more powerful than a zap or boost? If so, hell yeah! If not, can somebody help explain this to me?

As someone who’s never studied social media (and normally hates it), the idea of trust is kind of elusive to me in this context. That said, was trust also determined by someone’s downzapping skills? I kind of pride myself in my downzapping discernment. It’s one of my favorite parts of this platform.

SN release: No Trust November

> Downzaps are ~3x as powerful for influencing ranking as an equivalent amount sats upzapped or boosted

Am I interpreting this correctly? The wording is throwing me off. A downzap is three times more powerful than a zap or boost? If so, hell yeah! If not, can somebody help explain this to me?

As someone who’s never studied social media (and normally hates it), the idea of trust is kind of elusive to me in this context. That said, was trust also determined by someone’s downzapping skills? I kind of pride myself in my downzapping discernment. It’s one of my favorite parts of this platform.