pull down to refresh
related posts
10 sats \ 2 replies \ @2bithits 15 Feb 2023
I'm currently waiting on a 1.1sat/vb for 3 or 4 days now.
Confident it will get in over the weekend
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @TheBTCManual OP 15 Feb 2023
Screen shots please, I've been stacking on LN waiting to swap out to on-chain but these ordinal twats are insistent on me wasting sats to secure my transactions
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @2bithits 15 Feb 2023
Don't think they'll go away until the next "current thing"
reply
10 sats \ 1 reply \ @chytrik 15 Feb 2023
Nice post overall, I don't really mean to nitpick here, but some of this info seems like it would be irrelevant to (what I assume to be) the target audience of the post.
eg, creating a transaction that is larger than the blocksize limit would require a massive number of inputs (or and even more massive number of outputs), I would reasonably only expect certain bitcoin businesses to find themselves in such situations.
I'm also curious about the 'old protocol' section - are there any examples of when this may occur? Maybe with reeeally old software that is trying to P2IP or something like that? I would assume that any users creating such transactions (eg other non-standard transactions) are power users, and know what they're getting into, anyways.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @TheBTCManual OP 15 Feb 2023
Yes, you're right, that some of the "reasons" are not applicable, and would be something most people wouldn't need to look into, I just thought it would be good to mention it. Hence the headings, so people can just skim through, which from the data shows most poeple do lol
I don't know who is going to read the content we put out, or what year they'll read it in, or their understanding or implementation of bitcoin. Might be helpful might not be
reply