pull down to refresh
Footnote definitions are ordered in a dumb-ish way, basically a comes after the 4 lol
I didn't want to implement footnotes with anything other than numbers because it felt weird... but at the same time footnote references should not allow non-numeric values to be considered references.
What made the footnote definitions' implementation trivial is the fact that it's a normal numeric ordered list with normal list items
Yeah that's a behavior change from before, doesn't have to be a bug per se.
[^ðŸ˜][^a][^4][^3] would previously display as [1][2][3][4] and correspond to the numbered list in the footer as
----
1. ...
2. ...
3. ...
4. ...the only issue right now is that a displayed [ðŸ˜] corresponds to item 1 in the list, except there is no way to tell other than by the #fn-<x> and #fnrev-<x> in the urls.
Edit: perhaps not parsing non-numericals (and forcing us to order them manually) is the easy solution, or the hard mode otherwise, replacing the <ol> with a <ul> and parsing the ref from the [^definition]:?
Awesome!! Thx @SimpleStacker
Do note the order, and that now the fn-char is shown in the post but not in the note numbering (and because the re-enumeration doesn't happen, the order becomes odd)
I can file a bug if that helps.