The absolute risk (X dollars) for the coin flip in these games is decided by the poor person (20% of their "wealth"). 

If the poor person could tolerate the absolute risk of the rich person, I wonder if the outcome changes.

I think you understood me. Some people would probably run out of money sooner, but I have a feeling the distribution would be a little more even.

k00b

One side effect will be that random set of people will run out of money in that case. If 0 wouldn't be issue, then I'd expect normal distribution around the starting point? (I'm not 100% sure I understood your question though, also I'm not that smart...)

nout

все и так будет равномерно... для этого нужно время. сатоши заложил 141 год... посмотрим что из этого выйдет... 

selfish_gene

bitcoin

Why the super rich are inevitable

I'd like to see an alternative model, where people who lose risk what the people who won risk. ie if you distribute risk tolerance evenly, regardless of current capital, what happens?