pull down to refresh
Impressive. How many times have you had to manually rebalance / pay for inbound, if at all?
None. Despite the evidence so far, I believe prices can do the work of maintaining balance.
So were you actively setting prices on your channels?
Yes, still am.
It's a pretty simple adjustment, where I make the 5 fullest channels cheaper and the 5 emptiest more expensive. It's asymmetric, though, so it should settle on the cheapest average fee that balances [some of] the channels. It also wasn't given a ton of thought, so maybe it will settle elsewhere.
I need to try this. My experience with routing (naive, didn't actively set prices) ended up with traffic very much one way and imbalanced channels.
I remember you mentioning that, particularly about how much outward pressure there is from Stacker News. That channel has been perpetually full so far.
Even after I paid for ~econ, my Stacker News Channel filled back up in like two days.
Ten channels with about 13M total capacity.