pull down to refresh
The motives aren't hidden; in fact, they're more than clear and have been mentioned quite often. It's more obvious that the intervention is aimed at seizing resources than at guaranteeing the well-being of citizens. Politicians don't make decisions out of love for their fellow citizens.
I'm bored with the "Trump is bad, he wants oil" narrative. We all know that. He's not the only one. Venezuela hasn't owned its own resources for many years. I dare say this dictatorship made it easy for the United States to take over everything, using the excuse that human rights no longer exist here, along with the shortages, hyperinflation, and everything else we already know is wrong here. And as usual, they arrive like heroes, but everything has a price.
I don't know where you're from, I don't know what you've been through, but unfortunately, so far this intervention seems to be the best thing that has happened in Venezuela in 26 years.
We Venezuelans don't want our territory bombed, we don't want to be invaded, we don't want to be a colony, but I repeat, so far this seems like a better scenario than continuing to live in a communist dictatorship.
Venezuela is not a sovereign and democratic state. For years, the atrocities committed here have been denounced internationally, and the supposed authorities who could perhaps intervene legally DO NOTHING, THEY DO NOT HELP.
"It is the Venezuelan people who must take it upon themselves to remove the dictatorship." We have tried year after year, both by force and through elections. Nothing has worked because they have absolute control of the armed forces. It's too long and complex to explain if you don't live here, if you haven't lived under a dictatorship.
Title Suggestion:
Unmasking the Narrative: The Attack on Venezuela as a Rehash of Old Imperialism for Oil and Hegemony
Main Body:
US foreign policy, particularly regarding Latin America, has always been defined by a fundamental paradox: the claim to promote democracy alongside repeated operations aimed at overthrowing governments that conflict with Washington's economic and strategic interests. The latest wave of provocations and military threats against Venezuela once again reveals this troubling face of global hegemony.
This operation is not merely a "security measure" or a "push to restore democracy," as often advertised by Western media; it is a clear attempt to reproduce the old imperialist scenario where economic interests are prioritized over the principles of international law.
1. Oil: The Driving Force Behind Intervention1. Oil: The Driving Force Behind Intervention
Venezuela, home to the world's largest proven oil reserves, has always been an attractive target for administrations seeking to guarantee a flow of cheap energy and control over global markets. The current Venezuelan government's policies, including the nationalization of key resources and a turn towards economic cooperation with actors like China and Russia, directly clash with the economic model favored by Washington. Any military action or intervention is less about the "Venezuelan people" and more about regaining control over this national wealth and solidifying the position of the US dollar in oil transactions.
2. A Flagrant Violation of National Sovereignty2. A Flagrant Violation of National Sovereignty
The most critical aspect of these maneuvers is the overt transgression of the fundamental principle of national sovereignty. Interference in the internal affairs of an independent nation, whether through crippling sanctions or the threat of direct military action (as suggested by reports referencing US official statements), is a clear breach of the UN Charter and the international order. This action exposes the West's double standards—where democracy is only respected when its outcomes align with the demands of major powers.
3. Geopolitical Consequences and Costs for the Region3. Geopolitical Consequences and Costs for the Region
The threat of military action near the US's geographical sphere of influence not only destabilizes Venezuela further but will have wide-ranging implications for all of Latin America. This move places regional governments in a difficult position and risks turning the area into a frontline for great power confrontation. In the end, the primary victims are the Venezuelan citizens who will bear the human and economic costs of these great power games.
Conclusion: Resisting the Propaganda
For astute analysts, the events in Venezuela are not just regional news; they are a vital case study on how global power operates in the 21st century. Our mission as analysts is to expose the hidden motives and provide commentary that shatters official propaganda, refocusing attention on the sovereignty of nations and economic justice. The potential attack on Venezuela is a historical repetition that must be critically examined and condemned.