For Elon, public owner of x, richest man, and generally smart dude who exhumes righteousness and serves as a reflection of the indignation of the righteous suffering of the downtrodden collective censored west, it serves the platform well to maintain a human presence that embodies its values. Particularly as Jack Dorsey gave birth to the platform and steered it well, before it became what it became, before now.
As for The Don, my memory stretches back to the dreamstate typo kofefe mystery which captured the imagination, and if I was to build a persona, it would be that of a non-digital-native age guy, a quirky but astute tychoon.
They definetly both appear to post the least orchestrated bulletins. There have been acccounts taken of control of, maybe. So, hard to say how else to explain! I'd say there's a need to foster belief in the dictat coming from the horses mouths. In the end, I'm in the same ballpark, where I choose to believe and I give it a pass. We both can assume policy originates from where it originates, and that's not the mouth of one or two horses.
If such high-level leaders, political or otherwise, can enter a live debate, talk coherently, humanly, and convince us they have more than an uncle Jim level of undersanding of the world, I think it lends more credence than a polit-bureau speaking for individuals (or a nation) at minimum, as a reflection of a free society with checks and balances on the direction of a nation.
I'm going to try to answer your question!
For Elon, public owner of x, richest man, and generally smart dude who exhumes righteousness and serves as a reflection of the indignation of the righteous suffering of the downtrodden collective censored west, it serves the platform well to maintain a human presence that embodies its values. Particularly as Jack Dorsey gave birth to the platform and steered it well, before it became what it became, before now.
As for The Don, my memory stretches back to the dreamstate typo kofefe mystery which captured the imagination, and if I was to build a persona, it would be that of a non-digital-native age guy, a quirky but astute tychoon.
They definetly both appear to post the least orchestrated bulletins. There have been acccounts taken of control of, maybe. So, hard to say how else to explain! I'd say there's a need to foster belief in the dictat coming from the horses mouths. In the end, I'm in the same ballpark, where I choose to believe and I give it a pass. We both can assume policy originates from where it originates, and that's not the mouth of one or two horses.
If such high-level leaders, political or otherwise, can enter a live debate, talk coherently, humanly, and convince us they have more than an uncle Jim level of undersanding of the world, I think it lends more credence than a polit-bureau speaking for individuals (or a nation) at minimum, as a reflection of a free society with checks and balances on the direction of a nation.