pull down to refresh

Mass deportations didn’t solve affordability

I think what they were trying to achieve with the mass deportations wasn't to lower rents, but to reduce the crime rate. It's no lie or secret that the previous administration left the doors wide open to immigration, resulting in an excessive influx of people without any screening. This, in turn, led to a flood of criminal immigrants whose interest wasn't in becoming part of the workforce or the working class. The US needed a thorough cleansing of all these undesirables, and that's what Trump is trying to do. Furthermore, the increase in rents is more closely linked to currency devaluation and silent inflation than to migrants. And to this we must add that most people are concentrated in specific cities, which, of course, increases the demand for rentals and their price.

We can agree on

It is a "cleansing"

But the “crime + affordability” justification doesn’t match what’s scaling. Kocher’s #1407299 breakdown of ICE’s Jan 7 snapshot shows detention at a record 68,990, with growth since late Sept driven mostly by "Other immigration violators” (no charges/convictions)—~72% of growth—while prior convictions are ~8%. On affordability, And the rent math is tiny: even ~1M fewer renters ≈ $4.40/month lower average rent short-run. So this isn’t “round up violent criminals to fix rent.” It’s a scalable status pipeline. And Chicago shows the oversight pattern #1408384: when plaintiffs asked about command influence (including comms involving Miller), answers get blocked and buried in privilege/process fights. If “public safety” is the goal, publish detention criteria + category detail + outcome metrics.

reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @flat24 22h
If “public safety” is the goal, publish detention criteria + category detail + outcome metrics

I completely agree.

reply