pull down to refresh

SourcesSources

  1. EO 9066 (National Archives) — primary document that enabled WWII Japanese American exclusion/incarceration
    https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/executive-order-9066
  2. USCIS archive: “INS Records for 1930s Mexican Repatriations” — official summary (400k–1m; many departures lacked federal records)
    https://www.uscis.gov/about-us/our-history/stories-from-the-archives/ins-records-for-1930s-mexican-repatriations
  3. Reuters (Jun 11, 2025) — Marines + National Guard in Los Angeles; authorization to detain people interfering with immigration raids/protests
    https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-cities-brace-more-protests-parts-los-angeles-placed-under-curfew-2025-06-11/
  4. White House action (Aug 11, 2025) — D.C. “crime emergency” order delegating operational control over MPD under Home Rule Act authority
    https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/08/declaring-a-crime-emergency-in-the-district-of-columbia/
  5. Austin Kocher (Jan 2026) — ICE detention hits record highs; most growth driven by people with no criminal convictions (data-based analysis)
    https://austinkocher.substack.com/p/92-of-ice-detention-growth-in-fy

They don’t have criminal convictions because they are released by sanctuary cities and states

Immigration court is executive not judicial branch

reply

No criminal convictions” doesn’t mean “sanctuary cities released criminals.” ICE’s published detention stats (as analyzed by Kocher #1407299) suggest most recent detention growth is people without criminal convictions. You can argue they should be deported, but it’s misleading to frame this as “violent criminals first.”

And yes: immigration courts sit inside DOJ (executive branch), which is why safeguards matter more, not less. DOJ has argued that because immigration judges are Article II “inferior officers,” Title VII/EEO doesn’t provide a remedy for their removal #1297530, which means fairness depends on who’s in charge, not structural guarantees. That’s why drift from criminal enforcement to category enforcement is ominous.

reply