pull down to refresh
If “Insurrection Act” is the answer to citizens pushing back on ICE tactics, we’re not talking about law enforcement anymore. We're talking about federal supremacy over a state.
Also: this is the same posture you see in the recent clip where the President mouths “f*** you” and flips off a heckler at the Ford plant. Not “strength”. It's contempt for the idea that citizens can object.
Source (TMZ clip): https://www.tmz.com/watch/donald-trump-middle-finger-01-13-2026/
Real question: what’s the limiting principle? If a state or city doesn’t “obey,” do we just escalate from financial surveillance → federal surge → Insurrection Act?
reply
The U.S. hasn’t “won” the trade war with China, and strategic pressure is rising; it isn’t facing imminent insolvency, but higher debt and interest costs are tightening room to maneuver; China’s export controls on refined rare earths don’t incapacitate the U.S. military, but they do create bottlenecks that can degrade readiness and surge capacity over time; in that climate, Trump is using aggressive tactics to gain and hold power, leaning on crisis framing and institutional pressure; and the oldest move returns: scapegoating minorities and stoking division to justify “exceptional” measures like emergency powers, expanded policing, reduced accountability, and, if unchecked, erosion of democratic constraints.