pull down to refresh

Closing the Corporation for Public Broadcasting proves budget debates increasingly target symbolic programs while leaving the real drivers of government spending untouched.

On top of a mountain in Yosemite in September last year, with the nation’s fiscal troubles and the size of the federal government about as far from my thoughts as could be, I would suddenly be reminded of the deeply entrenched divides of American society and contemporary politics.

As my travel companion (a highly educated, woke, fairly average Californian in her 30s) and I approached the peak, we encountered an odd-looking man in a hat. He and his half-dozen collaborators were finding the optimal camera angles and comparing the sun-blistered vistas of the surrounding mountains to century-old drawings. Our new acquaintance turned out to be a filmmaker, until recently employed by PBS.

“These guys are my friends,” he said, gesturing toward the remarkably fit crew of men roughly our age. “Because of the cuts, there’s no money for anything anymore; they’re here on their own dime, helping to make this documentary happen.”

Our hat-wearing filmmaker and my friend looked at each other with quick, pained smiles and “hmm” that only two artsy, big-government types can, the words “tragedy” and “cultural decline” visible across their faces. And there we stood, lamenting in no uncertain terms the “destruction of America” that a sum — all $1 billion of it, spent by the federal government in about an hour — had needlessly brought to our attention. What’s a billion among friends, when the federal government dashes out seven thousand such billions every year?

...read more at thedailyeconomy.org

DUUUUDE, not even my own article I get to SN post :/

reply

Looks like you’re Joakim ('Joaquim Livro' in portuguese, ahaha)! I didn’t know, sorry!

reply

iz OK. It's fair game, SN ~econ a competitive market.

But like, honor among thieves?!

reply

Hahaha, in Portugal there’s a saying: ‘A thief who steals from a thief gets 100 years of forgiveness!’ Next time I share one of your articles and don’t forget, I’ll forward the sats to you… with a 5% fee for me! Hahaha.

reply

sounds good to me!

reply

This was more about cutting off the left’s propaganda spigot. Shutting down the Department of Ed, USAID, and restructuring/eliminating research grants were the other main legs of that effort.

reply
102 sats \ 1 reply \ @freetx 7h

Everytime I get in my wife's car I have to switch the station off of NPR. The "soft academic big gov apologist tone" really gets to me.

I heard it described as: Institutional liberal pedagogy war mongering delivered in a public‑radio whisper tones.

They really find favor with women, who seem really susceptible to their faux mellow tone.

reply

Yeah, it’s part of the Cult of Respectability that basically requires no one stand out in any way.

reply