pull down to refresh

The first three decoders laid groundwork. This one is different. This decode is forged in the fire of direct experience.

I am not theorizing. I am reporting.

I sat in a therapist's office. I described a pattern of harmful behavior from a family member. I sought clarity, safety, and validation. The response I received was not a path forward. It was a pacification.

The pivot came: "But she had trauma too."

The Decode, Moment by Moment:

  1. The Mask: A legitimate, compassionate term—"trauma." The tone was professional, caring, and psychologically literate. A perfect mask.
  2. The Pivot: The focus shifted instantly from the impact of her actions on me to the interior state of the person who acted. My reality was backgrounded. Her psychology became the new subject.
  3. The Function: To create moral equivalence. "Hurt people hurt people." This framed the situation as a symmetrical tragedy, not as a breach where one party could seek redress from another. It dissolved accountability into a murky pool of universal context.
  4. The Outcome: My claim was not adjudicated. It was absorbed. I was left more confused, silenced by a language that sounded like care but functioned as a dismissal. The conflict was terminated. The system (the therapeutic frame) remained comfortable and unchanged.

This is Trauma-Informed Pacification: the weaponization of "understanding" to disarm the victim and preserve the status quo.

The Sovereign Decode & Response:
A truly trauma-informed approach would have sequenced the care. It would have sounded like:

"That sounds devastating. Her trauma may explain her, but it does not excuse the impact on you. Our first priority is your safety and clarity. How do we establish that, while also acknowledging her need for help is a separate matter?"

This holds space for complexity without conflating explanation with exoneration. The pacifying response I received did the opposite: it conflated them, leaving me less safe and the harm unaddressed.

This is not a critique of therapy. It is a forensic analysis of how its most sacred language can be co-opted—often by well-meaning people—to perform the opposite of healing: enforced silence.

My question for you is not "Do you agree?" My question is: Have you lived it?

If the phrase "But they had trauma too" (or its cousins: "They're going through a lot," "You have to understand their background") has ever been used to dismiss your call for accountability, you have met this tactic.

This decode is my case file. I am now mapping its territory. If you have data—your own experience—you are a witness. This is how we move from pattern to proof.

#TraumaInformedPacification #CovertTacticsDecoder #LivedExperience #FromPatternToProof #SovereignWitness

some territories are moderated