Ouch! 280,000 jobs and $52 billion in lost revenue in just one state, due to soured relations with Canada. Decades of relationships erased in a year.

For Florida workers, the consequences were immediate and personal. Service sector wages stagnated as labor demand collapsed. Healthcare access declined as private clinics closed. Working-age residents began leaving the state altogether, accelerating population churn and weakening consumer demand even further. What began as a tourism shock evolved into a labor market crisis.
…
Tourist tax revenues collapsed by as much as 50% in some jurisdictions. Infrastructure projects were frozen. School districts cut programs. Emergency reserves were drained at record speed. This was the moment the illusion ended: Florida was not experiencing a downturn—it was confronting the consequences of a trade war that transformed consumer trust into a strategic fault line.

The fiscal consequences are compounding. Property tax shortfalls are forcing counties to raise rates on remaining residents, accelerating affordability crises. School districts face chronic underfunding as tourism-linked revenues fail to recover. Infrastructure maintenance is deferred, not delayed. Deferred maintenance becomes decay. Decay drives further out-migration. The feedback loop tightens.

Internal planning models used by regional development agencies indicate that even under the most optimistic assumptions, no more than 30% of former Canadian winter spending is projected to return over the next decade. That implies a structural loss of roughly $35 to $40 billion in annual economic activity. This is not a recessionary dip—it is a reset. The scale is comparable to the long-term decline of a major industrial sector, except this collapse did not originate from global competition or automation. It originated from political miscalculation.
…
That mismatch explains why the United States failed to anticipate the scale of damage now unfolding across Florida and other tourism-dependent regions. Policymakers focused on factories, ports, and export balances while ignoring a far larger vulnerability: services, consumer trust, and allied behavior. Tourism was classified as discretionary, apolitical, and resilient. That assumption proved catastrophically wrong.

In reality, Canadian travel to the United States functioned as a form of soft capital. It stabilized local labor markets, smoothed municipal budgets, supported private healthcare systems, and inflated real estate valuations. When that capital withdrew, there was no federal backstop. No emergency lending facility exists for lost goodwill. No stimulus can replace millions of individual decisions not to cross a border.