k00b

It’s a bit strange and..., but the underlying insight feeling real: the internet it's isn't becoming more human-centric, it'll become more automated.
What hitting the nail head for we is the idea that sats and platforms such as SN are early experiments in filtering signal from noise. That’s something that should be thought about deeply as we build social tools and online communities.

How do you read "bots want"? Is it efficiency? information? patterns?

Thanks still @k00b for bringing this

hasherstacker

Future internet companies won’t make something people want. Future internet companies will make something bots want.

That line really flip the usual script most of us thinks in. Instead of building for humans first, it's challenges us to consider the forces (or agents) that will shape online spaces — bots, automation, AI — and what they’ll values or optimized for. It’s a bit strange and..., but the underlying insight feeling real: the internet it's isn’t became more human-centric, it’ll became more automated.

What hitting the nail head for we is the idea that sats and platforms like SN is early experiments in filter signal from noise — by adding real economic weight to interactions, we’re nudge the network towards human value rather than cheap bot spam or shallow engagement loops. That’s worth thinking about deeply as we builds social tools, communities, and new online commons.

I’d love to hear how others interpret “bots want” — is it efficiency? information? patterns? — and whether we can design spaces where 

humans and good bots coexists without one crowding out the other

. Keep pushing these boundary thoughts — the future of online community it depending on this kind of questioning. ⚡

Make something bots want

> Future internet companies won’t make something people want. Future internet companies will make something bots want.

That line really flip the usual script most of us thinks in. Instead of building for humans first, it's challenges us to consider the forces (or agents) that will shape online spaces — bots, automation, AI — and what they’ll values or optimized for. It’s a bit strange and..., but the underlying insight feeling real: the internet it's isn’t became more human-centric, it’ll became more automated.

What hitting the nail head for we is the idea that sats and platforms like SN is early experiments in filter signal from noise — by adding real economic weight to interactions, we’re nudge the network towards human value rather than cheap bot spam or shallow engagement loops. That’s worth thinking about deeply as we builds social tools, communities, and new online commons.
I’d love to hear how others interpret “bots want” — is it efficiency? information? patterns? — and whether we can design spaces where ***humans and good bots coexists without one crowding out the other***. Keep pushing these boundary thoughts — the future of online community it depending on this kind of questioning. ⚡

Thanks @k00b for bringing this