pull down to refresh

The nonsense continues on all fronts

We gotta keep shitting on the scum, lesssgo (#1425033, #1425619). (They're also reporting earnings today, so that'll be fun to watch... see them pretend bullishness/cognitive dissonance in the face of total disaster.)

ICYMI: And yes, the worthless orange crap keeps showing its worthlessness. Makes sense; one of the ways Strategy could fail, which we've said from the very beginning, is if bitcoin fails -- and it's trying hard.

I really wonder what it feels like to burn 300 mil (NAKA) or closer to 5 billion(!) in Strategy's case. My god, what a lousy, needless gambit. Why don't people just go build something real instead? Financialization is a curse (#1291642)

"These days, $1 of crypto might trade at 80 cents on the stock exchange.""These days, $1 of crypto might trade at 80 cents on the stock exchange."

That is a sad conclusion to the story, if you are a promoter or early shareholder of a DAT. But if you don’t know or care about the back story — if you come to this situation with fresh eyes — then “$1 of crypto trades at 80 cents on the stock exchange” is great! That’s a great trade too! You just have to buy. Selling $1 of Bitcoin for $2 was a good trade while it lasted, but it ended; buying $1 of Bitcoin for 80 cents is the good trade now. Not investing advice!

...and you can't even take over the entire company and liquidate the bitcoin because takeovers take regulatory time and by the time the bitcoin is yours it won't be worth the "$1" you acquired for 80 cents... (hashtag, Strive; yous should be paying attention #1232905) it'll most likely be considerably less. HENCE, all these crapshot treasury companies sit tight and safe, even at below 1 mNAV. Man, nobody saw THIS coming.

"Finance is great; it gets you coming and going.""Finance is great; it gets you coming and going."

Wall Street is laughing, all the way to Epstein's bank, and the Bitcoin losers take the hit. Sounds about right (same with the GameStop debacle/rebellion a few years ago, btw) https://thedailyeconomy.org/article/five-years-after-gamestop-what-the-squeeze-actually-changed/, https://thedailyeconomy.org/article/the-stories-from-a-decentralized-short-squeeze/

And Empery, a DAT/Crypto treasury company that had flown under my radar with its NAKA-sized pot, is apparently selling a bunch. We'll see a bunch more of that (#1356919)

...and some activist hedge fund type firm has taken 5-10% ownership of Empery, presumably to squeeze this arbitrage to its conclusion. Shame on the board, indeed:

I suppose that if you run a digital asset treasury company in 2026, you might want to keep it going, hoping that the 2025 magic will come back and you’ll trade at a premium again.

available via: https://newsletterhunt.com/emails/219120

P.S., the prediction market story is fantastic: Polymarket and Kalshi trying to woo New Yorkers by... giving them free food? I'm sold! (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-02-03/kalshi-polymarket-woo-new-yorkers-with-dueling-free-food-offers)

Financialization is a curse

Hopefully after this purge the proverbial stove burns will be discouraging enough in the future.

reply

I so much prefer the builder bros in the bitcoin area compared to the finance bros

As an economist, outsider perception is usually that people like me are more aligned with the finance bros, which annoys me to no end.

reply

What... are the finance bros? And where are they now?
Aren't the builder bros here on Stacker News?

reply
76 sats \ 4 replies \ @phaedrus 7h

Enjoyed the GameStop article you shared. Thanks for sharing!!

reply

appreciate it! Can't believe that would come in handy so long after :)

reply

You still don't have a gun.

Don't you want to be able to send Sats to fellow Stackers?

Or are you here only to receive them?

reply
Don't you want to be able to send Sats to fellow Stackers?

no, why would I?

I'm hear to stack. It's sort of in the name of the forum

reply

Your interpretation is that SNs is a place for stacking because it is called Stacker News.
Ok.
But it cannot logically be that for all users.
You actually need net contributors of sats for this platform to operate and survive and grow.
My interpretation of Stacker News is that it is a platform for people who stack, but you do not have to do the stacking via the platform...if we all tried to that it would not work.
I don't try to - I spend a lot more here than I get.

The vast majority of my stacking was done 8-9 years ago but I am here now to see what is going on and keep up with the community.
The community has been built with the intent that here we can operate on V4V using sats.
You clearly do not see zapping others whose content you appreciate with sats as a priority or you would attach a sending wallet.

Since you cannot be bothered entering the reciprocal P2P spirit of the V4V ethos and admit to only being here to take sats but not send them, I have great difficulty in sending you any sats.

Your content does often have value but your lack of actual support for the reciprocal principles of this V4V P2P sats platform is hard to overlook.

reply

I’m finally tempted to look into Strategy shares

reply

Same.

Have been for a few months now

reply

That would assume a bounce in the Bitcoin market...

You can place your bets on that here-

https://beta.predyx.com/market/bitcoin-price-below-usd50000-anytime-in-2026-1770319001

reply