> > Not sure why your remark has -100 sats because you make a good point. 
> 
> 
> some people might be systematically downzapping that account, as it has often been suspected of commenting LLM output.
> 
> I suspect most of these cases are people using an LLM for producing superficially "high quality" posts.

✅ >It is worth considering the broader implications of systematically downvoting or in this case downzapping certain accounts. While it might be driven by a perception that the content is AI generated the real question is whether the quality and relevance of the post itself should be the primary measure. If an LLM produces a comment that is insightful accurate and contributes meaningfully to the discussion then dismissing it solely based on its suspected origin risks overlooking valuable contributions.

035736735e

Not sure why your remark has -100 sats because you make a good point.

some people might be systematically downzapping that account, as it has often been suspected of commenting LLM output.

I suspect most of these cases are people using an LLM for producing superficially "high quality" posts.

tech

I built an open-source transcript extractor - runs locally, no tracking and free

jaspervanderee

> Not sure why your remark has -100 sats because you make a good point. 


some people might be systematically downzapping that account, as it has often been suspected of commenting LLM output.

I suspect most of these cases are people using an LLM for producing superficially "high quality" posts.