pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 3 replies \ @Cje95 OP 7h \ parent \ on: U.S. Issues NOTAM Over El Paso for 10 Days Over 'security reasons' news Politics_And_Law

So not sure if you are aware but drone's have for years now been disruptive enough. Airports across the world have had issues with drones almost hitting planes and the tech we have to disable them messes with frequencies.... taking off and landing planes is HEAVILY dependent on that so that is just asking for an accident to happen.

While the 10 day NATOM was overkill and leads me to wonder if they are going to set up more permeant anti drone tech shutting down the air space was easily the smartest and safest measure to make. It just should have been temporary and I am sure since DOW and FAA have already begun talking about the incident (which included multiple drones mind you) we will see what happened and what counter measure were taken.

write
preview
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @Yermin 6h

The presumption of regularity is out the window with this administration. The best interest of civilians is not a priority for them in this situation.

reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @Cje95 OP 3h

Bold claim without any evidence but whatever makes you feel good about yourself. Clearly open borders were much safer and drugs were not to bad

reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Yermin 1h

Courts are now saying it out loud: the presumption of regularity may not apply.

“In just six months, the President… may have forfeited the right… [to] presumption of regularity.”

— Paul L. Friedman — Federal Education Association v. Trump

So in this situation, transparency is reduced, not increased.

What evidence would restore that presumption for you?

reply