Only two possibilities: (1) She is that much of an idiot and the Trump admin is completely tone deaf on how much most people, irrespective of political persuasion want action on the pedophile elites; or (2) The people implicated in the files are so powerful that the only way they can arrest them is with absolute unified insistence from the public on both sides, and he is purposely downplaying them in an absurd way to get his opponents to demand justice. I honestly don't know which it is, obviously I hope it's the latter, even if Bondi really isn't in on the game.
pull down to refresh
Were you not paying attention this week?
In the hearing yesterday she brought up congresses search history against the files... Search functionality she provided earlier this week.
The DOJ logged their searches, and now the DOJ knows who each congress critter is protecting based on their search history.
Every name they looked up.
Every document they opened.
Every file they downloaded.
ALL OF IT. LOGGED.
In the hearing, she pulled out a document labeled "Jayapal Pramila - Search History."
Instant panic.
Rep. Jayapal called it "spying on members of Congress."
Rep. Raskin accused Bondi of "blatant abuse of power."
Rep. Moskowitz said it was "suspicious and inappropriate."
Why are they so scared of their search history?
If you're searching for evidence of crimes against children you'd be proud of that search history. Unless you're not searching for evidence, but rather, your own name or connections.
They shit a kitten, blocked the funding bill to shut down DHS, and left Washington for recess.
The same week Congress gets caught searching Epstein files they refuse to fund the department that investigates trafficking.
The slow walk is a sting operation, you're not paying attention and damned sure not long enough popcorn. 🍿
Long popcorn
If she is acting... she should be in film. She comes off and an grade a moron. Has from day one to me.
fwiw I agree it's painful to watch, the Gaetz version of the script would have been far funnier.
Enjoy the movie.
well what to expect from a politician, the whole thing is a farce. But I saw the clip of her being grilled on victims and she started going on about how Trump has juiced the snp and how amazing it is and it's like , what the fuck is this clown show.
Q - is Trump a peado
A - have you seen how great the snp is recently?
They have all been taught not answer questions with yes or no, so they just keep squirming and talking any old bollocks and deflecting, it's painfully obvious.
So i dont think it's so much stupidity, just being a piece of shit person and sociopath, while trying to control the narrative away from uncomfortable questions
Q: why haven't you prosecuted anyone? (Good question)
A: Dow is 50K (Very dumb answer)
Smart answer would be: We have to have evidence beyond email and where we do we will build cases over time. Not like you retards did anything about this last administration.
But she went with a very dumb answer. Either she is dumb, and Trump is tone deaf, or they're doing it on purpose to drive demand for action from EVERYONE.
mighjt be a combo of all three!
Even if she is that dumb, there were statements there that reflected character in a way that is inexcusable among someone of any level of intelligence.
I care zero about her being nasty, but she is vastly underestimating how many people in both parties want justice for the pedo elites
Exactly, and I think that betrays a serious character issue. The fact that she was posturing politically was more than tone-deaf. It showed she's not out for justice like she should be.
I think they’re counting on the public’s ability to eventually move on to the next thing.
think this will be a hard one for a lot of people to move on from. It's not some misgendering of a trans person.
Covid and lying about WMD in Iraq should have been hard to move on from too.
I haven't followed the story that closely. Is there actual incriminating evidence of crimes within the Epstein files? Because chumminess with Epstein and innuendo, while disgusting, is not a crime.
Being in the emails, even admitting you enjoyed a "torture video" as one did isn't proof of anything, but you'd think knowing there was trafficking, it would be probably cause to investigate them. Put differently, if you posted about killing or torturing someone, let alone a minor, the police would probably show up at your door.
I saw this, which I thought was hilarious. Same thing?
No, I think he's actually lying because he was involved.
same. I need a tl;dr for what's the latest in the sandbox
The three most well-known Epstein associates (and all-but-certainly people who shared in some of his crimes) are Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, and Donald Trump. That last one pretty much ensures Bondi will not take any action.
Trump could obviously have done something, but the files released so far say the opposite, that he reported Epstein to the police.
Can people be really so dumb, listening to politicians words?
why the fuck are you so statist ?
Why even bother to comment on a statist post, you fucking statist?
buahahahaha calli8ng Darth a statistt is the ultimate statism ever.