pull down to refresh

Im not going to do this justice, but im trying to conceptualize the difference between the digital world—AI, and the physical world—humans

Full disclosure—im using the emm dashes, its not AI


Im struggling to conceptualize this thought but when an AI gets out of control the humans can kill it's electricity and stop it, but stop food and water to a human and it stops, so same thing right?

We both need energy to process information, if the energy stops, we both die

This statement, which I wrote, is trying to say this....

In the news we see that AI are taking all the jobs right?!

But the AI lives in the data centre, in a digital world

But the data centre itself is rooted in the physical world

And the physical data centre is controlled by humans

So he who owns the data centres, owns the world

And this holds firm, until the AI is able to communicate with robots

Currently humans can hunt, gather food to gain energy

AI is trapped in a data centre, but when it can instruct robots to build infrastructure

That's when AI can bridge the digital world into the physical world

Who knows how robots would hunt and gather electricity, which is their energy


So for the time being we'll see the likes of Google Amazon Musk Zuck, be holding the leash on AI, but even the tech giants will get bitten and drop the lead

  1. AI is at a technical level literally just auto-complete
  2. FUD is pushed by the few that can afford to use regulatory capture as a weapon, its like any other oligopoly
  3. People are the real risk, like any other asymmetrical technology bad people can use it to do bad things. AI's won't kill people, people will use AI's to kill people.
reply

I agree with you, but I'm not convinced that humans aren't also just auto-complete.

reply

So we should fear the concentration of power and human incompetence far more than we should fear the software itself

Needed the JS filter to seperate the BS 💪

reply