pull down to refresh

The original Peter Muller article, to which this newsletter piece is a bit of an ode, is Proprietary Trading: Truth and Fiction. A personal goal of mine is to read something like that and actually know what he's talking about.

Here was a nice summary though:

Trading” profits arise mostly from structural inefficiencies, of which there are many. Some participants are institutionally required to trade at predetermined times, and in directions that intelligent participants can forecast. Other participants have funding costs and constraints that other participants can take advantage of. Certain participants have different risk appetite than others. These structural inefficiencies can arise from institutional constraints and physical limits, but even in an ideally designed market they would still exist because there are asymmetries among participants.

“Investing” profits arise mostly from informational inefficiencies. A portfolio manager reasons about the changes in the supply chain induced by AI and figures out that certain firms will benefit and others will suffer, before the information is priced by the market. Another portfolio manager remembers that an obscure tax exception for hotels is set to expire, and shorts them.

I once heard a talk called "Hedge More, Bet More", which argued that due to asymmetries in beliefs, if you give traders more tools for hedging (i.e. managing risk), you actually cause them to bet more on the beliefs they hold more strongly than the market. Multiply that across many different traders with many different beliefs, and introducing new tools for hedging actually amplifies market risk coz people make bigger bets. I thought it was an interesting idea.

A personal goal of mine is to read something like that and actually know what he's talking about.

That's basically the reason I started studying economics in college.

reply

Yes. I generally feel that I have a reasonable grasp of thongs, but then I read an article like this and a lot of it makes me stop and try to figure. It's definitely not something I have a good grasp of.

reply
I generally feel that I have a reasonable grasp of thongs

preserved before you can edit!

reply

Well, it's probably more accurate anyway.

reply